In the contemporary discourse on climate change, the role of renewable energy sources as a pivotal solution is a topic of intense debate. Proponents argue that transitioning to renewable energy is essential for mitigating the adverse impacts of climate change, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and fostering sustainable development. On the other hand, skeptics contend that the costs and technical limitations associated with renewable energy make it an impractical and unrealistic alternative to traditional sources.
Advocates of renewable energy assert that harnessing the power of sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectricity is a logical step towards a more sustainable future. They point to the finite nature of fossil fuels and the environmental consequences of their extraction and combustion, including air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The argument is strengthened by the declining costs of renewable technologies, making them increasingly competitive with conventional energy sources.
To reinforce the case for renewables, one can cite countries that have successfully implemented large-scale renewable energy projects, experiencing significant reductions in carbon emissions. For instance, Denmark has become a global leader in wind energy, with wind turbines supplying a substantial portion of its electricity. This practical application not only validates the feasibility of renewable energy but also underscores its potential to reshape national energy landscapes.
However, skeptics counter these arguments by highlighting the intermittent nature of renewable sources. The intermittency and variability of solar and wind energy production, for instance, pose challenges to ensuring a consistent power supply. Critics also argue that the initial investment required for transitioning to renewable energy infrastructure is substantial, potentially diverting resources from other pressing issues.
To strengthen the argument in favor of renewables, it’s crucial to emphasize ongoing advancements in energy storage technologies. Innovations like high-capacity batteries and smart grids address the intermittency issue by storing excess energy during peak production periods for use during low-production periods. This not only enhances the reliability of renewable energy but also positions it as a viable solution for achieving energy security.
Moreover, proponents stress the economic benefits associated with renewable energy adoption. The renewable energy sector has witnessed rapid job growth, providing employment opportunities and stimulating economic development. Countries investing in renewable technologies are not only reducing their carbon footprint but also positioning themselves as leaders in a burgeoning industry with global economic implications.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding renewable energy’s viability is complex, with arguments on both sides requiring careful consideration. Strengthening the case for renewables involves citing successful applications, emphasizing technological advancements, and highlighting economic advantages. Ultimately, striking a balance between environmental responsibility and economic feasibility is imperative for steering the global energy landscape toward a sustainable and resilient future.
- How can a country heavily reliant on fossil fuels effectively apply the argument in favor of renewable energy to positively impact both the environment and the economy?
A) By increasing subsidies for fossil fuel industries
B) By implementing large-scale renewable energy projects
C) By maintaining the status quo in energy policies
D) By focusing solely on the economic costs of renewable energy adoption
2. What makes the case for renewable energy a strong argument in the passage?
A) The claim that renewable energy is the only viable solution
B) The emphasis on the declining costs of renewable technologies
C) The dismissal of the intermittency issue associated with renewable sources
D) The assertion that skeptics are entirely wrong in their assessment
3. What aspect weakens the skeptics’ argument against renewable energy in the passage?
A) The emphasis on the intermittent nature of renewable sources
B) The assertion that the initial investment for renewable infrastructure is substantial
C) The argument that transitioning to renewable energy diverts resources from other pressing issues
D) The claim that renewable energy has no environmental benefits
4. If advancements in energy storage technologies successfully address the intermittency issue, how might it impact the skeptics’ conclusion about renewable energy?
A) It would strengthen their argument against renewable energy
B) It would have no impact on their conclusion
C) It would weaken their argument against renewable energy
D) It would change their focus to other technical limitations
5. How does the passage suggest achieving a balance between environmental responsibility and economic feasibility in the context of renewable energy?
A) By prioritizing economic feasibility over environmental responsibility
B) By focusing solely on the economic benefits of renewable energy adoption
C) By acknowledging the complexity of the debate and considering both environmental and economic aspects
D) By dismissing economic considerations and solely emphasizing environmental responsibility
Answers:
- B) By implementing large-scale renewable energy projects
- B) The emphasis on the declining costs of renewable technologies
- C) The argument that transitioning to renewable energy diverts resources from other pressing issues
- C) It would weaken their argument against renewable energy
- C) By acknowledging the complexity of the debate and considering both environmental and economic aspects
Get best resources for CLAT 2025 exam here.
Do join the whatsapp group to stay updated.