Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 420: This section deals with cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property. It is often invoked in cases involving fraud or deception where an individual is accused of deceiving another person or entity to gain property or monetary advantage.

Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 17: This section defines ‘fraud’ in the context of contractual agreements. It covers cases where a party to a contract deceives another, leading to damage or injury.

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34: This section allows a person to seek a court declaration on any legal right as to property or status. It is commonly used in property disputes or any civil matter where a person’s legal rights are in question and a clear legal declaration is needed.

1. Situation: An individual purchases an antique necklace based on the seller’s assurance of authenticity. It later turns out to be a fake. Which legal principle is most directly challenged?

A) Misrepresentation in a contract

B) Fraudulent transaction

C) Breach of contract

D) Criminal conspiracy

2. Situation: A contractor agrees to construct a building following specific safety standards but fails to do so, leading to structural issues. The building owner seeks legal action. What is the primary legal concern here?

A) Non-compliance with safety standards

B) Breach of contractual terms

C) Criminal negligence

D) Fraud and deception

3. Situation: A homeowner sells a property but conceals information about a legal dispute related to the land. Upon discovering this, the buyer wants to nullify the sale. What legal ground does the buyer have?

A) Misrepresentation of facts

B) Non-disclosure agreement violation

C) Breach of property law

D) Criminal deception

4. Situation: A startup falsely claims to have a patent for its technology to attract investors. The investors later sue the startup. What is the primary accusation against the startup?

A) Violation of patent law

B) Misrepresentation and fraud

C) Breach of investor trust

D) Unfair trade practices

5. Situation: A landowner sells a piece of land with forged documents. The buyer, unaware of the forgery, later faces legal challenges. What is the primary legal issue for the buyer?

A) Entering a contract under false pretenses

B) Owning property with disputed title

C) Victim of fraud

D) Involvement in property laundering

Answers

1. Answer: B) Fraudulent transaction
   • Explanation: The situation involves a seller providing false information about the authenticity of an item, which falls under fraudulent activities, misleading the buyer.
2. Answer: B) Breach of contractual terms
   • Explanation: The contractor failing to adhere to agreed safety standards in construction breaches the terms set in the contract with the building owner.
3. Answer: A) Misrepresentation of facts
   • Explanation: Concealing information about a legal dispute when selling property is a misrepresentation of facts, which can lead to nullification of the sale agreement.
4. Answer: B) Misrepresentation and fraud
   • Explanation: By claiming to have a patent that doesn’t exist, the startup misrepresented its status to investors, constituting fraud.
5. Answer: C) Victim of fraud
   • Explanation: The buyer, unknowingly purchasing land with forged documents, is a victim of fraud perpetrated by the seller.

Do join the whatsapp group to stay updated.

The post Practice Passage #23: Legal for CLAT appeared first on ForumCLAT Academy.

In India, the right to freedom of speech and expression is enshrined in the Constitution under Article 19(1)(a). However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions, including public order, morality, and the interests of sovereignty and integrity of India. To strike a balance between the protection of free speech and the prevention of hate speech, India has enacted various legal provisions and regulations.

One of the primary legislations addressing hate speech in India is Section 153A and Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Section 153A deals with promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., while Section 295A deals with deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting their religion or religious beliefs. Violation of these sections can result in criminal prosecution.

Additionally, the Information Technology Act, 2000, contains provisions that address hate speech in the digital domain. Section 66A of the Act, which criminalized the sending of offensive messages through communication services, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015 for being vague and overbroad. However, Section 69A of the same Act allows the government to block online content that it deems prejudicial to national security, public order, or decency.

The legal reasoning surrounding hate speech in India involves a delicate balance between safeguarding the fundamental right to free speech and expression and protecting the nation’s social fabric and communal harmony. Courts in India have played a pivotal role in interpreting and applying these laws, often relying on a contextual analysis to determine whether a particular expression qualifies as hate speech. Furthermore, they have stressed the importance of proportionality, ensuring that restrictions on free speech are reasonable and necessary in a democratic society.

In conclusion, hate speech in India is a complex legal issue that necessitates a judicious balance between the right to free speech and the imperative to maintain social cohesion and harmony. The legal framework in India seeks to address this issue by criminalizing hate speech while respecting the principles of proportionality and reasonableness. Legal reasoning in this context involves a careful examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding each case to ensure that the legal response is just and in line with constitutional values.

Question 1: Situation: A public figure made a controversial statement about a religious community during a public speech. This statement led to protests and a potential threat to public order. Which legal provision can be invoked to address this situation?

A) Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)

B) Section 295A of the IPC

C) Section 66A of the Information Technology Act

D) Section 69A of the Information Technology Act

Question 2: Situation: A social media post criticized a religious leader, leading to communal tension in a region. However, the post did not contain any explicit hate speech. Which of the following legal principles should be applied in this case?

A) The principle of proportionality

B) The principle of strict liability

C) The principle of absolute freedom of speech

D) The principle of reasonable restrictions

Question 3: Situation: An individual made derogatory remarks about a particular caste, but these remarks were made in a private gathering and did not lead to any public unrest. Can this individual be prosecuted for hate speech under Indian law?

A) Yes, under Section 153A of the IPC

B) Yes, under Section 295A of the IPC

C) No, as it did not lead to public unrest

D) No, because it was said in a private gathering

Question 4: Situation: An online forum contains multiple posts criticizing government policies, but none of them promote hatred or violence against any group. The government decides to block this forum. Which legal provision allows the government to take this action?

A) Section 66A of the Information Technology Act

B) Section 295A of the IPC

C) Section 69A of the Information Technology Act

D) Section 153A of the IPC

Question 5: Situation: A political leader made inflammatory remarks against a rival party, but these remarks did not target any specific religious or ethnic group. Can these remarks be considered hate speech under Indian law?

A) Yes, under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act

B) Yes, under Section 153A of the IPC

C) No, as they did not target a specific group

D) No, because they were made by a political leader

Question 6: Situation: A book criticizes certain religious beliefs and practices, causing controversy. People from the criticized religion demand a ban on the book, citing that it hurts their religious feelings. Which legal provision can be invoked in this situation?

A) Section 295A of the IPC

B) Section 153A of the IPC

C) Freedom of Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution

D) Section 66A of the Information Technology Act

Answers:

1. B) Section 295A of the IPC
2. D) The principle of reasonable restrictions
3. C) No, as it did not lead to public unrest
4. C) Section 69A of the Information Technology Act
5. C) No, as they did not target a specific group
6. A) Section 295A of the IPC

Get best resources for CLAT 2025 exam here.

Do join the whatsapp group to stay updated.

The post Legal for CLAT : Practice Passage #20 appeared first on ForumCLAT Academy.