Logical Reasoning for CLAT : Practice Passage #10


In the hushed corridors of an ancient library, where the scent of aged parchment mingled with the faint whisper of turning pages, there lay an enigmatic tome known only as the “Codex of Luminaries.” Its weathered cover, adorned with faded glyphs, belied the wealth of wisdom hidden within its pages—a repository of arcane knowledge, guarded by riddles and cryptic passages.

The Codex was said to hold the keys to unlock the mysteries of the universe, sought after by scholars and sages for centuries. Legends spun tales of its origin, attributing its creation to a cabal of erudite minds, each contributing their esoteric insights to this opus of intellect.

Within its first chapter, inscribed in ornate calligraphy, lay a fable that veiled profound philosophical conundrums. It narrated the journey of a nameless wanderer through a labyrinthine forest, each path shrouded in twilight, where every fork in the road posed a riddle as enigmatic as the last. The wanderer’s quest was not merely to navigate the tangled groves but to unravel the mysteries concealed within the whispers of the ancient trees.

As the wanderer ventured deeper into the heart of the forest, encountering serpentine trails that forked and twisted like the convoluted pathways of the human mind, the riddles grew more labyrinthine. Each clue, each cryptic hint concealed within the verdant embrace of nature’s enigma, demanded not just astute reasoning but a grasp of profound allegory.

The foliage whispered secrets that echoed through the wanderer’s consciousness, testing the limits of logic and imagination. The interplay between light and shadow seemed a metaphor for the elusive nature of truth itself, revealing itself in fleeting glimpses, teasingly out of reach.

At pivotal junctures, the wanderer encountered inscriptions etched onto ancient stone monoliths, cryptic symbols demanding decipherment. Some questions posed were seemingly paradoxical, teasing the boundaries of reason, demanding a nimble mind capable of embracing ambiguity.

The Codex, by its very design, aimed not only to challenge the intellect but to probe the depths of perception, demanding an understanding that transcended the ordinary. It wasn’t merely a compendium of puzzles; it was an intricate tapestry woven with the threads of allegory, philosophy, and the boundless expanse of the human intellect.

It beckoned those who sought not just answers but the unraveling of the very fabric of thought itself—a testament to the insatiable curiosity of the human spirit, forever entwined with the pursuit of wisdom and the yearning for understanding.

Questions inspired by the tale of the wanderer through the forest’s labyrinth would probe the depths of comprehension, challenging aspirants to navigate intricate passages of reasoning, decipher allegorical symbolism, and extract the essence hidden within the labyrinth of words and ideas.

Table of Contents

Questions

  1. Based on the passage, which statement best represents the primary purpose of the Codex of Luminaries?

A) To guide travelers through physical labyrinths and forests.
B) To challenge the intellect by weaving allegorical wisdom and puzzles.
C) To document historical events and ancient civilizations.
D) To preserve traditional folklore and mythical legends.

2. How does the wanderer’s journey through the forest relate to the challenges posed by the Codex of Luminaries?

A) The forest is a direct representation of the Codex’s physical structure.

B) The wanderer’s journey symbolizes the mental and intellectual challenges embedded within the Codex.

C) The wanderer’s quest is merely a distraction from the true essence of the Codex.

D) The forest holds literal clues that lead to the physical location of the Codex.

3. Which statement weakens the comparison between the wanderer’s journey and the challenges within the Codex?

A) The wanderer’s journey lacked the complexity portrayed by the Codex.

B) The wanderer’s ability to decipher nature’s clues directly correlates to understanding the Codex.

C) The Codex’s challenges are too abstract to be compared to a tangible forest journey.

D) The Codex’s clues are more straightforward than the forest’s enigmatic whispers.

4. Which pair of statements presents a contradiction within the passage?

A) “The wanderer sought truth amidst fleeting glimpses” & “The wanderer comprehended every truth encountered.”

B) “The forest’s foliage whispered secrets” & “The wanderer remained oblivious to nature’s secrets.”

C) “The Codex was a repository of arcane knowledge” & “The Codex held no secrets, only riddles.”

D) “The wanderer’s quest demanded astute reasoning” & “The wanderer’s journey required no intellectual prowess.”

5. If another ancient text were discovered, claiming to surpass the Codex of Luminaries in complexity and depth, what logical inference can be drawn from the passage?

A) The newly discovered text is likely to involve similar allegorical challenges and intellectual depths.

B) The Codex of Luminaries was the ultimate repository of all ancient knowledge.

C) The new text would be irrelevant compared to the timeless wisdom of the Codex.

D) The complexity of the new text would invalidate the challenges posed by the Codex.

Answers

  1. Answer: B) To challenge the intellect by weaving allegorical wisdom and puzzles. Explanation: The passage describes the Codex as an enigmatic tome that holds arcane knowledge guarded by riddles and cryptic passages. It emphasizes the repository’s purpose to challenge scholars with allegorical puzzles, aligning with the notion of intellectual stimulation rather than serving as a guide or documenting historical events.
  2. Answer: B) The wanderer’s journey symbolizes the mental and intellectual challenges embedded within the Codex. Explanation: The passage draws parallels between the wanderer’s journey through an intricate forest and the challenges posed by the Codex. Both involve navigating through enigmatic paths and deciphering clues, symbolizing mental and intellectual challenges rather than a literal guide or distraction.
  3. Answer: A) The wanderer’s journey lacked the complexity portrayed by the Codex. Explanation: The statement weakens the comparison by suggesting that the wanderer’s journey was less complex than the challenges portrayed in the Codex. It challenges the notion that the forest journey was on par with the complexity of the intellectual challenges within the Codex.
  4. Answer: A) “The wanderer sought truth amidst fleeting glimpses” & “The wanderer comprehended every truth encountered.” Explanation: These two statements present a contradiction within the passage. While the first statement suggests that the wanderer sought truth but found it fleetingly, the second statement implies a complete comprehension of encountered truths, creating a contradiction in the wanderer’s perception and understanding.
  5. Answer: A) The newly discovered text is likely to involve similar allegorical challenges and intellectual depths. Explanation: The passage emphasizes the profundity and depth of the Codex’s challenges, indicating that if another ancient text claimed to surpass it, it would likely involve similar intellectual challenges and allegorical depths, aligning with the essence of the Codex’s purpose.

 Do join the whatsapp group to stay updated.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Open chat
Ask me anything!
Scan the code
Ask me anything.